Editorial trust

How we evaluate products

The technical, commercial and editorial criteria used in Cavetechia evaluations.

01

Specifications and sources

We confirm capacity, continuous power, start-up peak, battery chemistry, cycles, solar inputs and other relevant specifications. Official data is prioritised and missing information is identified.

02

Fit for real use

We assess whether a product meets the selected scenario without being undersized or unnecessarily oversized. Runtime, mobility, installation, expansion and safety margin are considered.

03

Price, availability and warranty

We check current price, availability, market and warranty conditions. These factors distinguish technically equivalent options but never replace technical validation.

Our standard

Commercial availability, data quality and technical recommendation are treated separately. When information is insufficient, we show the limitation instead of filling gaps with assumptions.

Partner data is not an independent Cavetechia lab test

Our partner brands are the primary source for product specifications, warranty terms and feed data. Cavetechia may normalise, compare and calculate from those values, but we do not claim that manufacturer-supplied specifications are measurements performed by us. Where we publish a Cavetechia calculation, it is labelled as a calculation; where a specification comes from a partner, it is labelled as partner/manufacturer data. Product warranties remain the responsibility of the manufacturer or seller under their published terms.

Open Cavetechia Verified Data